Every now and then, I get emails from students who want to interview me for a research paper. For some reason, they just make me feel snarky.
Here’s one that landed in my mailbox yesterday, in the form of a Facebook friend request. I’m going to change the student’s name, but the rest of the email is verbatim.
“Hi my name is Suzy Student and I am writing a paper for my psychology class. I would really like to interview you via email as my expert. The paper is concerning Tarot card readings, it will be just a quick ten questions and I’d be so grateful.”
I’m sorry, but that just set off all kinds of red flags.
- I don’t know Suzy Student. I’ve never met her in real life, and she’s not one of my Facebook friends yet, either. She seems to have found me by doing a Facebook search on “tarot.”
- There’s nothing inherently wrong with approaching people on Facebook. I’ve met and asked questions of strangers myself. But — and this is an important distinction — my Facebook profile is public. People can see that I’m a real person. They can see who I am, where I live, and what I do, both personally and professionally. Suzy Student’s Facebook is private, and she didn’t provide any information about herself. If she’s a student, is she in high school or college? Where does she go to school? In this day and age, you can’t just trust that people are who they say they are. Sorry, Suzy Student, but right out of the box you sound a little like a scammer.
- Suzy says she’s writing a paper for a psychology class. Okay. What kind of psychology class? Psych 101, or abnormal psychology? The answer to that question is going to make a big difference in my response.
- Let’s go one step further: What’s the subject of Suzy’s paper? What is her thesis? What’s her approach? Is she going to be respectful of tarot-card readers, or is she going to make fun of them? I’d want to know that before I jump into this project with her, too.
- In fact, without knowing who I’m writing, or how my words will be used, I can’t be sure that my remarks really would become part of a student’s paper. They could become part of some fundamentalist’s anti-tarot website, or a mocking newspaper article. My written response could be twisted, distorted, or misrepresented. As a professional writer, I can’t just send information to a nebulous entity, and turn over control of my words to someone I don’t know or trust.
- Well, let’s assume for a minute that Suzy really is a student, as she says. “I would really like to interview you by email,” Suzy writes, “as my expert.” Gosh. I could be Suzy’s own personal, private expert? What an honor! Quick! Get me the phone so I can call my mom! She’ll be so proud of me!
- Suzy also announces that she’s got “ten quick questions.” Ten questions? Ten? Are you kidding me? Assuming that I spend ten minutes composing a “quick” response to each question — which isn’t unreasonable, given that I’m usually pretty careful with my words — Suzy is asking me to give her at least an hour and forty minutes of my time. Yet she’s surprisingly dismissive of the time commitment that’s involved. It’s “just” a few quick questions, after all — questions that probably took “just” five or ten minutes to compose.
- Ten questions. You know, if I didn’t know any better, I’d say that the answers to ten questions could probably make up the brunt of a fairly good-size paper — but Suzy Student wouldn’t be trying to get me to write a term paper for her, would she? No, the Suzy Student I know would never try to pull a stunt like that.
- Happily, Suzy offers me a little something in return: she says she’d be “so grateful.” Well, if that doesn’t melt your heart, nothing will.
Sigh. Against my better judgment, I responded. I was a student once myself, after all, and I have daughters of my own who have to write papers for school, too. I decided to give Suzy Student a chance.
Hi Suzy! I’m working on a really tight deadline right now, but I have a suggestion: you could research the answers to your questions by looking through my books, and then I’d be happy to review your paper and add a personal quote or two.
That would be great but unfortunately it has to be an interview.I already have the paper pretty much writtne I just need the interview to turn in with my notes.Plus I’ll need to throw in a quote from you.Perhaps I can email them to you and you could answer when you get a sec. I know you’re really busy and I would be eternally grateful.
1.How does a Tarot reading work?
2.I’m thinking of hosting a party and wanted to hire a tarot reader,what can I do at home to make the mood right?
3.Which spread is your fave and why?
that’s really it…I have the answers to the rest of my questions I just need some quotes from the answers to these 3 and I will be done. Thank you thank you thank you
- “Unfortunately,” Suzy writes, “it has to be an interview.” How is that “unfortunate?” And who says anything “has” to be an interview? Remember, I’m still not aware of what kind of class Suzy is taking, or what kind of paper Suzy is planning to write.
- Suzy reports that she already has the paper “pretty much writtne.” Yeah, “writtne.” Already I regret not working closely with such a careful, conscientious scholar. Well, if she’s got the paper “pretty much writtne,” why is she bothering me with a request for more information? Please. Her paper isn’t writtne yet. As a writer myself who regularly fends off editors at deadline time, I know that scam.
- “I just need the interview to turn in with my notes,” Suzy writes. There’s a tip-off to Suzy’s grade level, I guess. High school senior? College freshman? When I was in ninth grade, I had to turn in my notes for a paper, but teachers are more demanding now.
- “Plus I’ll need to throw in a quote from you.” Hmm. It seems to me I just offered to provide a quote … but not on Suzy’s terms.
- “Perhaps,” Suzy suggests, “I can email them to you and you could answer when you get a sec.” Yes. I could do that, as soon as I have six thousand “secs” to spare.
1.How does a Tarot reading work?
I’ve written hundreds of pages — entire books — on that question. Should I cut and paste those texts into an email, or would it be okay to suggest that Suzy actually visit a library for the answer?
2.I’m thinking of hosting a party and wanted to hire a tarot reader,what can I do at home to make the mood right?
I think Suzy means, “If I were thinking of hosting a party and wanted to hire a tarot reader, what could I do at home to make the mood right?” So she’s not a grammarian. I can live with that.
In fact, her question itself is pretty good – but it would probably take me at least 30 minutes to compose a detailed response, and Suzy and I are already getting on each other’s nerves.
3.Which spread is your fave and why?
Which spread is my “fave?” I’m a middle-aged woman, not a teenager. I don’t know that I have any “faves.” If you rephrase the question, I suppose I could reveal my “favorite” spread … but now I’m just being picky.
Those aren’t simple questions to answer, but if you send me a copy of your paper I’ll see what I can do. If you’re looking for something faster, I would suggest that you make an appointment with a tarot reader in your area, and ask the questions in person.
I don’t need my paper reviewed my facts have already been verified.Yhank you for your time but I went with someone else on facebook who found my questions answerable.

November 14, 2009 at 12:09 pm
LOL… sounds like Suzy should have her head examined by the professor of her ‘psych-class’… I bet he’s her fave! And they can both go over the decorations needed for the padded-cell she can be detained in, with the glittery shades of pink that are like so totally in right now!
November 14, 2009 at 1:54 pm
Gosh, Corrine, I expected her to go a step further and admit that she used lowercase “wikipedia” to verify her facts! There goes my faith in Suzy Student’s research abilities…
November 14, 2009 at 3:06 pm
I think you gave her a chance and were very patient, Corrine. I really think she didn’t think it out!
November 14, 2009 at 3:17 pm
Oh, this is rich, Corrine! You rock! I get these all the time too. Back when I was a very new newbie (as far as being publicly available) I got involved in TWO of these. One was a psych grad student at UNC-Chapel Hill who turned out to be MUCH more interesting than me!
But then, the next one was a black hole of time-suck and ignorance that ended up nowhere.
I love your approach, it is so much more civilized than what I do these days: mostly I just ignore them, unless something really rings true and interesting for me.
– Beth
November 14, 2009 at 6:09 pm
Corrine, this was fascinating reading. I was invited last year to “collaborate” (with a person unknown to me and I daresay the entire Tarot world)on a new book, by joining her carefully-selected stable of “Tarot celebrities” who would provide input. Would I please join her on this project since she respects me so much? She would provide the questions and topics for my written responses. I emailed my very direct questions: “Do you have a plan or outline? Do you have a topic or vision? Is any of this on paper yet? Are you hoping to have ten Tarotists write your book for you and then name yourself as the author?” She responded that I was “very perceptive” and answered “No, No, No, No, No, and Yes”. At least she was honest. She did have a bunch of stuff on her Facebook page, but I have been contacted by many carefully-crafted nonexistent Facebook people. Live and learn. I don’t beat around the bush. I just ask them if I have correctly identified their purposes. Or like Beth, I snort and move on. Thank you for an excellent post, Mz. C. I doubt, however, that my grammar and syntax will pass muster!
November 14, 2009 at 7:54 pm
Oh, Ferol, I honestly didn’t see anything wrong with your comment until you messaged me, and THEN I had to go back and read it again. Are you worried about a missing space? Meh. I never pick on people for innocent mistakes — especially in casual remarks! Those don’t count. But maybe that was Suzy Student’s first mistake. She had a somewhat formal request. She should have treated it like a business communication, rather than a chatty Facebook hello.
November 14, 2009 at 8:45 pm
Well, good then! I got a kick out of getting worked up about it, ha ha! The whole process has been so much fun, Corrine. It made me think about so many things. You are an asset to the Tarot world and to the world in general. I swear, there is only one Corrine Kenner. Thanks for making us think and making us laugh. You would be amazed in how many contexts phrases from your past blog posts show up in my thoughts. Laughs and pointed awareness are a wonderful combination.
November 14, 2009 at 7:45 pm
Snicker
Poor kid. I have to admit, my threshold includes well written, polite, informative requests (from people who can spell and construct a sentence). I probably wouldn’t respond to something coming from Facebook!
November 14, 2009 at 8:41 pm
Thank you so much for this post. It really spells it out for you. I had a similar experience- in fact, I was extremely gracious to a student who came to an open event, and then emailed me some questions which I took a long time to answer carefully. And I forwarded her questions on to other people to answer- I am glad none of them responded, I believe.
She was thankful in the beginning, but I got no follow-up “here was what I did with your answers” or thank you at all after the fact.
Also a college student researching the anthropology of religion…
Lesson learned- thank you for a thought-provoking post!
November 16, 2009 at 12:43 am
Thank you Corrine for sharing this, I’ve got a couple of requests like that through my blog also from psychology students, usually I ignore them, like you wrote, they have formal request but a chatty way to ask for it. This article provided me (us) useful guidelines on how to deal with matters like this.
November 16, 2009 at 3:37 pm
I never had to do a paper in tarot subjects in any of my extensive and comprehensive psychology classes. It might have been intersting to me but not to coventional and traditional academics. So, I think this was a high school student trying to do something “funny” to use as a ridicule tool. In any case, you were right to not fall into that trap.
Cindyx
November 24, 2009 at 5:22 pm
I didn’t know whether to laugh or wince as I read this. I think I did both. Though I teach English Composition, not psychology, I still saw many of my students in “Suzy.” They choose a topic they think will be “easy,” do as little research as they can, write their paper based on what they think they already know, and go back and slap a few quotes into their papers because they are required to do so by the professor. In this case, I’m also willing to bet that for this assignment, an interview with a knowledgeable person was one of the required sources.
I’m glad you shared how you handled this. Next time I require an interview for one of the research papers I assign, my class and I are going to have a long talk about how to politely approach a potential source and how to show respect for the knowledge they have.
November 29, 2009 at 6:36 pm
That was quite funny. It’s crazy how she sounded so exasperated that you wouldn’t give in to her just like that, when she should have bothered, indeed, to go through your books first.